11 U.S.C. Section 547 - Preferences Deep Dive

In-depth guide to preferential-transfer avoidance: the five-element prima facie case, the 90-day and one-year insider reach-back periods, the eight Section 547(c) defenses, and the 2019 SBRA amendments that reshaped trustee filing duties.

Home › Avoidance Actions › Section 547 - Preferences

Why Section 547 Exists

The preference power has two policy aims that have been part of American bankruptcy law since the nineteenth century. The first is equality of distribution: creditors of the same priority should receive the same percentage recovery, and a debtor on the eve of insolvency should not be permitted to prefer one creditor over another by paying that creditor ahead of others equally entitled. The second is preventing a destructive "race to the courthouse" that would push otherwise viable businesses into liquidation. By giving the trustee the power to undo preferential transfers, Section 547 reduces the incentive for creditors to grab assets in the period immediately before bankruptcy.

A preference action is not punitive. The creditor that received a preferential payment did nothing wrong in any moral sense; the creditor simply got paid on a debt that was owed. Preference liability is a structural consequence of the bankruptcy filing rather than a sanction for misconduct.

Official citation: 11 U.S.C. § 547

The Five Elements: Section 547(b)

Section 547(b) authorizes the trustee to avoid any transfer of an interest of the debtor in property if all five of the following are established:

  1. To or for the benefit of a creditor. Payments routed through third parties for a creditor's ultimate benefit count.
  2. On account of an antecedent debt. The obligation existed before the transfer was made.
  3. Made while the debtor was insolvent. Section 547(f) creates a rebuttable presumption of insolvency during the 90 days before filing.
  4. Made within the reach-back period. Within 90 days before filing for ordinary creditors, or within one year before filing for insiders as defined in Section 101(31).
  5. That enabled the creditor to receive more than it would have received in a Chapter 7 liquidation if the transfer had not occurred and the creditor received only what the Bankruptcy Code provides for its claim.

The "more than it would receive" element typically defeats preference claims against fully secured creditors, who would have recovered the full value of their collateral in liquidation regardless. The element is most easily satisfied against unsecured creditors when the estate's projected distribution to general unsecured claims is less than 100 cents on the dollar.

Reach-Back Periods and Insider Definition

The ordinary reach-back period is 90 days before the petition date. The insider reach-back period extends to one year before filing. Section 101(31) defines "insider" to include:

Courts also recognize "non-statutory insiders" whose relationship with the debtor is sufficiently close that transactions cannot reasonably be treated as arm's length. The Supreme Court addressed the standard for non-statutory insiders in U.S. Bank N.A. v. Village at Lakeridge, LLC, 583 U.S. 387 (2018), holding that appellate review of non-statutory-insider determinations is for clear error.

The Eight Section 547(c) Defenses

Even if the trustee establishes a prima facie case under 547(b), the creditor can defeat avoidance by proving any of the eight statutory defenses in Section 547(c):

The Ordinary-Course Defense: Subjective vs. Objective

Section 547(c)(2) is the most heavily litigated defense. Before 2005, a creditor had to prove both subjective ordinariness (course of dealing between the parties) and objective ordinariness (industry norms). BAPCPA amended the provision so that either prong now suffices.

The subjective prong is fact-intensive: the court compares pre-preference-period payment timing, communications, dunning patterns, and any unusual behavior against the historical baseline of dealings between the same debtor and the same creditor. Late payments, accelerated collection efforts, switches from check to wire transfer, and pressure tactics commonly defeat the subjective prong.

The objective prong requires evidence about industry norms for the type of debt involved. Expert testimony, trade-association data, and published payment-cycle benchmarks are typical evidentiary sources. The objective prong rescues some creditors whose dealings with the particular debtor were unusual but whose payment terms remained within an acceptable industry range.

2019 SBRA Amendments to Section 547

The Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 made two important changes to Section 547 that took effect February 19, 2020.

First, the SBRA amended Section 547(b) to require the trustee to engage in "reasonable due diligence in the circumstances of the case and taking into account a party's known or reasonably knowable affirmative defenses" before filing a preference action. This codifies a practice that many courts had already encouraged through pre-suit demand procedures and gives defendants a new procedural argument when the trustee files a complaint without first investigating obvious defenses.

Second, the SBRA increased the non-consumer venue threshold of 28 U.S.C. Section 1409(b) from $13,650 to $25,000 (currently adjusted higher). For preference actions below the threshold, venue lies in the district of the defendant's residence rather than in the bankruptcy court's home district, protecting smaller defendants from the cost of distant litigation.

The 547(c)(4) Subsequent-New-Value Defense in Practice

The subsequent-new-value defense in Section 547(c)(4) is a dollar-for-dollar offset that significantly reduces preference exposure in many trade-creditor scenarios. The defense applies when, after receiving a preferential transfer, the creditor extends additional credit to the debtor that is not itself secured by an otherwise unavoidable security interest and is not paid by an otherwise unavoidable transfer.

The mechanics are critical. Each preferential payment within the 90-day period is initially exposed, but subsequent shipments or services for which payment was never received (or was paid only by another avoidable transfer) reduce the exposure. Courts vary on whether the new value must remain unpaid as of the petition date or whether it may have been satisfied by an otherwise unavoidable means. The majority approach, sometimes called the "new value remains unpaid" view, has been displaced in many circuits by the "subsequent advance" approach that focuses on whether the new value was paid by avoidable means specifically.

A common preference-defense strategy for trade creditors is therefore to map every shipment and every payment during the 90-day period, identify which payments were preferential, and then apply subsequent new value as an offset. Many preference cases settle for a fraction of the gross transfer value once this analysis is completed.

Procedure, Statute of Limitations, and Recovery

Preference actions are adversary proceedings under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7001(1). Section 546(a) sets the limitations period: the later of two years after the order for relief or one year after appointment of the first trustee under Section 702, 1104, 1163, 1202, or 1302, subject to the absolute bar of case closure or dismissal.

Recovery proceeds under Section 550, which permits recovery from the initial transferee, the entity for whose benefit the transfer was made, or any mediate transferee that did not take in good faith for value. Section 502(d) disallows any claim of an entity from which property is recoverable until that entity returns the recoverable property, giving the trustee significant leverage in preference negotiations with creditors that hold ongoing claims.

Related Bankruptcy Code Sections

Bankruptcy Tools Network:
Discharge Screener · Research Platform · Exemptions by State · Keep Your Car · Keep Your House · Bankruptcy Cost