Home/Federal Judges/D.S.C.
Article III District Court - Bankruptcy Appellate Jurisdiction

United States District Court for the District of South Carolina

General framework explaining how this Article III district court hears bankruptcy appeals from the parallel United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina, including withdrawal of the reference under 28 U.S.C. s. 157(d) and the BAP election (where available) under 28 U.S.C. s. 158(c).

Short citation: D.S.C. | Circuit: Fourth Circuit | Last modified: 2026-05-23

Statutory framework

The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina is the Article III court that exercises original jurisdiction over all civil proceedings arising under title 11 or arising in or related to cases under title 11, under 28 U.S.C. s. 1334(b). By a standing order of reference adopted in each district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. s. 157(a), the district court refers those proceedings to the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina, which exercises the reference as a unit of the district court under 28 U.S.C. s. 151.

The district court retains two distinct powers over the referred caseload: (1) appellate review of final orders, judgments, and decrees of the bankruptcy court under 28 U.S.C. s. 158(a)(1), together with discretionary review of interlocutory orders under s. 158(a)(3); and (2) withdrawal of the reference, in whole or in part, on its own motion or on timely motion of any party under 28 U.S.C. s. 157(d).

Appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. s. 158(a)

Section 158(a) gives the district court mandatory appellate jurisdiction over (i) final orders, judgments, and decrees of the bankruptcy court; (ii) interlocutory orders entered under 11 U.S.C. s. 1121(d) extending or reducing the exclusivity period; and (iii) discretionary review of other interlocutory orders with leave of the district court. The standards of review follow ordinary appellate practice: findings of fact are reviewed for clear error, legal conclusions de novo, and discretionary rulings for abuse of discretion. Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure Part VIII governs procedure on appeal, including the notice of appeal (Rule 8002), the record on appeal (Rule 8009), and briefing (Rule 8014-8018).

The Fourth Circuit does not maintain a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Appeals from final orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina therefore lie as of right to this Article III district court under 28 U.S.C. s. 158(a)(1), with no BAP election available. Further review proceeds to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit under 28 U.S.C. s. 158(d).

Withdrawal of the reference under 28 U.S.C. s. 157(d)

Section 157(d) supplies two distinct withdrawal mechanisms. Permissive withdrawal allows the district court to withdraw, in whole or in part, any case or proceeding referred under s. 157(a) for cause shown. Courts within the Fourth Circuit typically weigh factors drawn from the line of authority following the Second Circuit's decision in Orion Pictures Corp. v. Showtime Networks, Inc. (4 F.3d 1095), including whether the proceeding is core or non-core, judicial efficiency, uniformity of bankruptcy administration, forum-shopping concerns, conservation of debtor and creditor resources, expediency of the bankruptcy process, and the presence of a jury demand.

Mandatory withdrawal under s. 157(d), second sentence, requires the district court to withdraw a proceeding if its resolution requires consideration of both title 11 and other laws of the United States regulating organizations or activities affecting interstate commerce. The motion must be timely; what constitutes timeliness is governed by local rule and case law in this district.

Constitutional limits: Stern v. Marshall

Following Stern v. Marshall (564 U.S. 462), the bankruptcy court may not enter final judgment on a state-law counterclaim that is not necessarily resolved in ruling on a proof of claim, even when the matter is statutorily designated as "core" under 28 U.S.C. s. 157(b)(2). Where Stern applies and the parties have not consented to bankruptcy-court adjudication under Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif (575 U.S. 665), the bankruptcy court submits proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to this Article III district court under 28 U.S.C. s. 157(c)(1), and the district court enters final judgment after de novo review of any matter to which a party objects.

Related resources

About this page

This page is a general framework. It does not list currently sitting Article III district judges, nor does it identify which judges of the district court are most frequently assigned bankruptcy appeals, because that information changes with court reassignments and chief-judge designations. For current personnel and case-assignment practice, consult the official court website. For Article I bankruptcy judges of the parallel United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina, see the bankruptcy judge directory for this district.

Statutory references are to the United States Code as in force on the last-modified date stated above. Always consult the current statute and applicable circuit precedent before relying on any framework summary.